Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Pakistan Nuclear
1. Nuclear
Powerin Pakistan
Pakistanhasa smallnuclearpower
program,with725MWe capacity,but is
movingto increasethissubstantially.
Pakistan'snuclearweaponscapabilities
of has arisenindependentlyof the civil
nuclearfuelcycle,usingindigenous
uranium.
BecausePakistanis outsidethe Nuclear
Non-ProliferationTreaty,due to its
weaponsprogram,it is largelyexcluded
fromtradein nuclearplantormaterials,
whichhindersits developmentof civil
2. nuclearenergy.However,Chinais
positiveaboutnuclearcooperationwith
Pakistan.
Pakistan in 2012 produced 96 billion kWh
of electricity, 35 TWh of this from oil, 27
from natural gas and 30 from hydro.
Nuclear power makes a small contribution
to total energy production and
requirements, supplying only 4.6 TWh
(4.7% of total electricity generated in
2012). Consumption in 2012 was about 77
billion kWh after 16% transmission losses.
There was virtually no import or export.
Total installed capacity is about 20 GWe,
but often only about 12 GWe is operable.
In 2005 an Energy Security Plan was
adopted by the government, calling for a
3. huge increase in generating capacity to
more than 160 GWe by 2030. Significant
power shortages are reported, and load
shedding is common.
In July 2013 the Executive Committee of
the National Economic Council (ECNEC)
approved 3.5 GWe of new power projects
totalling Rs 1303 billion ($13 billion),
comprising 2200 MWe nuclear, 425 MWe
gas combined cycle, and 969 MWe hydro.
These are designed to reduce the high
reliance on oil and to reduce power costs.
All depend on Chinese support.
Nuclearpower:-
The Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission
(PAEC) is responsible for all nuclear energy
4. and research applications in the
country. The PAEC is reported to have two
divisions which are responsible for nuclear
power programs: Nuclear Power
Generation (NUPG) and Nuclear Power
Projects (NUPP). The NUPG directorate
oversees the operational units, and the
NUPP directorate is concerned with design
and construction of planned units, and is
closely aligned with the Nuclear Regulatory
Authority (PNRA).
PAEC's first nuclear power reactor is a small
137 MWe (125 MWe net) Canadian
pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR)
which started up in 1971 and which is
under international safeguards – KANUPP
at Paradise Point in Sindh province, about
5. 25 km west of Karachi. It is operated at
reduced power, and is under review by
PAEC because of its age.
The second unit is Chashma 1 in Punjab
province in the north, a 325 MWe (300
MWe net) two-loop pressurised water
reactor (PWR) supplied by China's CNNC
under safeguards. The main part of the
plant was designed by Shanghai Nuclear
Engineering Research and Design Institute
(SNERDI), based on Qinshan 1. It started up
in May 2000 and is also known as
CHASNUPP 1. Designed life span is 40
years. It, and the following 3 units, were
built using international design codes and
standards.
6. Construction of its twin, Chashma 2,
started in December 2005. It was reported
to cost PKR 51.46 billion (US$ 860 million,
with $350 million of this financed by
China). A safeguards agreement with IAEA
was signed in 2006 and grid connection
was in March 2011, with commercial
operation in May. Upgrades have added 5
MWe since (to 330 MWe gross).
At KANUPP a 4800 m3
/day MED
desalination plant was commissioned in
2012, though in 2014 it was reported as
1600 m3
/day.
Operating
Reactorsin Pakistan
8. Karachi is also known as KANUPP, Chashma
as CHASNUPP.
Enriched fuel for the PWRs is imported
from China.
The 2005 Energy Security Plan included
intention of lifting nuclear capacity to 8800
MWe, 900 MWe of this by 2015 and a
further 1500 MWe by 2020. Projections
included four further Chinese reactors of
300 MWe each and seven of 1000 MWe,
all PWR. There were tentative plans for
China to build two 1000 MWe PWR units at
Karachi as KANUPP 2&3, but China then in
2007 deferred development of its CNP-
1000 type which would have been the only
one of that size able to be exported.
Pakistan then turned its attention to
9. building smaller units with higher local
content. However, in 2013 China revived its
1000 MWe designs with export intent, and
made overtures to Pakistan for the
ACP1000 design.
Chashma3&4:-
In June 2008 the
government announced plans to build
units 3&4 at Chashma, each 320 MWe
gross and largely financed by China. A
further agreement for China's help with the
project was signed in October 2008, and
given prominence as a counter to the US-
India agreement shortly preceding it.
In March 2009 China's SNERDI announced
that it was proceeding with design of
10. Chashma 3&4, with China Zhongyuan
Engineering Corp (CZEC) as the general
contractor and China Nuclear Industry No.5
Construction Company as installer. In April
2009, a design contract with SNERDI was
signed, and the government said that it had
approved the project at a cost of $2.37
billion, with $1.75 billion of this involving "a
foreign exchange component". In March
2010 Pakistan announced that it had
agreed the terms for Chashma 3&4,
whereby China would provide 82% of the
total US$ 1.912 billion financing as three
20-year low-interest loans. It would also
provide fuel for the reactors’ lifetime
nominally of 40 years.
11. The main construction contract was signed
in June 2010, and the two 340 MWe CNP-
300 (315 MWe net) units are to be
completed in eight years. They will have a
design life of 40 years and be under IAEA
safeguards. Construction of unit 3 officially
started at the end of May 2011, and unit 4
in December 2011. The dome of unit 3 was
fitted in March 2013. Early in 2014 PAEC
said they were several months ahead of
schedule.
In April 2013 it was reported that the PAEC
would receive a significant increase in
budget appropriation to expedite
construction of Chashma 3&4.
However, the Nuclear Suppliers Group
(NSG) raised some questions about China's
12. supply of Chasma 3&4. Contracts for units
1&2 were signed in 1990 and 2000
respectively, before 2004 when China
joined the NSG, which maintains an
embargo on sales of nuclear equipment to
Pakistan. China argued that units 3&4 are
similarly "grandfathered", and
arrangements are consistent with those for
units 1&2.
Chashma5:-
In November 2010 the PAEC
is reported to have signed a construction
agreement with China National Nuclear
Corporation (CNNC) for a fifth unit at
Chashma. In February 2013 a further
agreement was signed by PAEC with CNNC
for a 1000 MWe unit at Chashma. It was
13. reported that China expected that this deal
would be controversial under the NPT and
guidelines of the NSG. Early in 2013 CNNC
confirmed its intention to build a 1000
MWe class reactor, and said it would be an
ACP1000 unit, though not necessarily at
Chashma. The status of any continuing plan
for Chashma 5 is very uncertain, and it may
have been displaced by plans for a plant
near Multan in southwest Punjab.
Karachicoastalpowerproject:-
In June
2013 the Planning Commission said that
two CNNC 1000 MWe class reactors would
be used for Karachi 2 and 3 (KANUPP 2&3)
near Karachi unit 1. Two coastal sites had
been under consideration for the twin
14. 1100 MWe units. CNNC in April 2013
announced an export agreement for the
ACP1000, nominally 1100 MWe,
apparently for Pakistan. This was confirmed
in June by the PAEC which said that the
next nuclear project would be 1100 MWe
class units which it would build, the Karachi
Coastal Power station, costing $9.5 billion.
In July 2013 ECNEC approved two units of
the Karachi Costal Power Project with net
generation capacity of 2,117 MWe. The
total cost of this was estimated at Rs 959
billion ($9.595 billion), with $6.5 billion
(68%) being vendor finance. PAEC also said
that 82% of the total cost would be
financed by China. At the end of August
contracts were signed in Shanghai with
15. CNNC, China Zhongyuan Engineering Co.
Ltd. (CZEC), China Nuclear Power
Engineering Co. Ltd. (CNPE), Nuclear Power
Institute of China (NPIC), and East China
Electric Power Designing Institute (ECEPDI).
Ground breaking at the site near Paradise
Point, 25 km west of Karachi, took place in
November 2013, and first concrete was
envisaged by the end of 2014. However in
October 2014 the Sindh high court ruling
stopped site work following a challenge on
environmental grounds, and the restraining
order was extended to early December. In
April 2015 China Energy Engineering Group
Co (CEEC) won the tender for civil
engineering construction and installation
work for the conventional island of the
16. plant, which it said would use Hualong One
reactors. Construction is expected to start
at the end of 2015 and take 72 months (52
months for conventional island).
In the light of its inability to buy uranium on
the open market, PAEC says that Pakistan
has agreed with China to provide lifetime
fuel supply for the reactors, this being
specified as 60 years.
The Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
has received the safety analysis of China’s
ACP1000 reactor from CNNC and is
expected to take at least a year to
complete the review before granting a
construction licence.
19. In August
2011 it was reported that Pakistan aimed
for 8000 MWe nuclear at ten sites by 2030.
PAEC has apparently selected six new sites
on the basis of the Pakistan Nuclear
Regulatory Authority (PNRA) and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
advice. These are Qadirabad-Bulloki (QB)
link canal near Qadirabad Headworks; Dera
Ghazi Khan canal near Taunsa Barrage;
Taunsa-Panjnad canal near Multan; Nara
canal near Sukkur; Pat Feeder canal near
Guddu and Kabul River near Nowshera.
Early in 2012 PAEC said that four reactors
were planned for the Taunsa-Panjnad canal
near Multan in Punjab.
20. In January 2014 PAEC announced its
intention to build five further 1100 MWe
nuclear plants to meet anticipated
electricity demand, and have 8.9 GWe of
nuclear capacity on line by 2030. "With
more than 55 reactor-years of successful
operating experience to its credit, the PAEC
can confidently move from technology
acquisition status to actually starting
contributing sizable electrical energy to the
system." Then PAEC was quoted as saying
that eight sites would be chosen for a
further 32 units, four 1100 MWe units at
each, so that nuclear power supplied one
quarter of the country’s electricity from 40
GWe of capacity, this evidently
presupposing more than a tenfold increase
21. in electricity demand by a future date well
beyond 2030.
PAEC said an initial 1100 MWe plant would
be built at Muzaffargarh, on the Taunsa-
Panjnad canal near Multan in southwest
Punjab. It was also reported that
discussions with China were under way to
supply three nuclear power plants for
about $13 billion.
Fuelcycle:-
The government has set a
target of producing 350 tonnes U3O8 per
year from 2015 to meet one-third of
anticipated requirements then. Low-grade
ore is known in central Punjab at Bannu
Basin and Suleman Range.
22. A small (15,000 SWU/yr) uranium
centrifuge enrichment plant at Kahuta has
been operated since 1984 and does not
have any apparent civil use. It was
expanded threefold about 1991. A newer
plant is reported to be at Gadwal. It is not
under safeguards. It is not clear whether
PAEC has any involvement with these
plants.
Enriched fuel for the PWRs is imported
from China.
In 2006 the PAEC announced that it was
preparing to set up separate and purely
civil conversion, enrichment and fuel
fabrication plants as a new US$ 1.2 billion
Pakistan Nuclear Power Fuel Complex
(NPFC) for PWR-type reactors which would
23. be under IAEA safeguards and managed
separately from existing facilities. At least
the enrichment plant would be built at
Chak Jhumra, Faisalabad, in the Punjab and
have a 150,000 SWU/yr capacity in five
years – about 2013, then be expanded in
150,000 SWU increments to be able to
supply one third of the enrichment
requirements for a planned 8800 MWe
generating capacity by 2030.
However, constraints imposed on Pakistan
by the Nuclear Suppliers Group may mean
that all civil nuclear development is tied to
China, and there may be no point in
proceeding with this civil Fuel Complex.
Wastes:-
24. The PAEC has responsibility for
radioactive waste management. A
Radioactive Waste Management Fund is
proposed in a new policy. Waste
Management Centres are proposed for
Karachi and Chashma.
Used fuel is currently stored at each
reactor in pools. Longer-term dry storage at
each site is proposed. The question of
future reprocessing remains open.
A National Repository for low- and
intermediate-level wastes is due to be
commissioned by 2015.
Regulation:-
The Pakistan Nuclear
Regulatory Authority (PNRA) is responsible
25. for licensing and supervision, and regulates
the safety and security of all civil nuclear
materials and facilities. In respect to the
Chashma reactors, and presumably also
the Karachi Coastal Power project, it works
closely with China's NNSA. It was formed in
2001, superseding the Pakistan Nuclear
Regulatory Board (set up by PAEC) and the
Directorate of Nuclear Safety and Radiation
Protection.
Pakistan is party to the convention on
nuclear safety and two international
conventions for early notification and
assistance.
R&Dand otheractivities:-
26. The Pakistan
Institute of Nuclear Science & Technology
(PINSTECH) at Rawalpindi near Islamabad is
managed by the PAEC and is one of the
largest science and technology research
establishments in the country. It has
conducted research into reprocessing used
nuclear fuel, though today it claims to be
focused on research in medicine, biology,
materials and physics, including production
of medical radioisotopes.
Pakistan has a 10 MW pool-type research
reactor, PARR-1, of 1965 vintage, supplied
by the USA under the Atoms for Peace
program. It was converted to use low-
enriched uranium fuel in 1991, and
upgraded from 5 to 10 MW. PARR-2 is an
27. indigenous 30 kW miniature neutron
source reactor (MNSR) based on Chinese
design and using high-enriched fuel
operating since 1974. Both are located at
the PINSTECH Laboratory, Nilore, near
Islamabad. They are under IAEA
safeguards. One of them produces some
Mo-99 from HEU targets.
New Labs at PINSTECH at Rawalpindi is
reported to be a reprocessing plant for
weapons-grade plutonium production, and
not under safeguards. It is run by PAEC and
operational since 1981. This was
apparently the culmination of a plutonium
weapons program predating the Kahuta
HEU weapons program, and replaced an
unfinished much larger reprocessing plant
28. (100 t/yr) being built at Chashma by
France, but cancelled in 1978.
A larger "multipurpose" reactor, a 50 MWt
PHWR near Khushab, 200 km south of
Islamabad, started operating in 1998 and is
evidently for producing weapons-grade
plutonium. A larger heavy water reactor
was built at Khushab from about 2002, and
appeared to be operational at the end of
2009. In 2006 building of a third reactor,
similar to and adjacent to the second,
started, with construction proceeding
rapidly. This appeared to be operational by
the end of 2013. A similar, fourth reactor
was then built a few hundred metres away,
and appeared operational in January 2015.
These seem to add up to a substantial
29. plutonium production capacity. Khushab is
reported to be making demands upon the
country's limited uranium resources. A
small heavy water plant is nearby.
Reprocessing of military material is
reported to take place at Chashma, 80 km
west, and the original French reprocessing
plant is apparently under renewed
construction there, a couple of kilometres
southwest of Chashma 1-4 power reactors.
The Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) at
Kahuta in Punjab is described as a weapons
engineering R&D institute and research
laboratory, focused on producing high-
enriched uranium using centrifuge
technology originally stolen from Urenco
by Dr Abdul Q Khan. Set up about 1976 as
30. the Engineering Research Laboratories it
was a key part of Pakistan's weapons
program, supported by the Army Corps of
Engineers in competition with the
plutonium program being pursued by PAEC.
It was renamed in honour of Dr Khan 1981.
Non-proliferation:-
Pakistan is not party
to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty but
does have its civil power reactors and two
research reactors (PARR 1&2) under item-
specific IAEA safeguards. An agreement for
two further 340 MWe reactors came into
force in April 2011. Pakistan has refused
calls for international inspections of its
enrichment activities.
31. Pakistan's Kahuta project (incorporating
Project-706) to produce a uranium bomb
was launched in 1972, following a
disastrous war with India. It was partly
financed by Libya to 1979. In May 1974
India exploded a nuclear test close to the
Pakistan border, galvanising Pakistani
efforts. The project was disbanded in 1983
after a successful cold test of weapon
components.
In May 1998 Pakistan exploded five atomic
devices in Baluchistan. At least one was
evidently made from enriched uranium,
but the Chagai II test in Kharan desert used
plutonium produced by New Labs.
Pakistan is reported to be the sole nation
blocking agreement of the Fissile Material
32. Cutoff Treaty (FMCT) in Geneva
negotiations.
Through the activities of Abdul Q.Khan, a
centrifuge plant and nuclear weapons
designs were supplied clandestinely to
Libya from the late 1990s to 2003 to
furbish a weapons program there. He also
transferred centrifuge technology to North
Korea in the 1990s, and to Iran. This is the
main basis for the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group
(NSG) refusing to ease nuclear trade
sanctions for Pakistan, as it has for India.
China is the only country to act in defiance
of trade sanctions, and has deepened
cooperation since the international US-led
concessions to India in 2008.
33. Addressing at the 3rd Nuclear Security
Summit at The Hague in March 2014, the
Prime Minister said that Pakistan had been
running a safe and secure nuclear program
for over four decades with the expertise,
manpower and infrastructure to produce
civil nuclear energy. He called for Pakistan’s
inclusion in all international export control
regimes, especially the Nuclear Suppliers
Group. He pointed out that international
treaties and forums would supplement
Pakistan’s national actions to fortify nuclear
security.
Domestically, he said that today the
country’s nuclear security is supported by
five pillars – a strong command and control
34. system led by the National Command
Authority (NCA); an integrated intelligence
system; a rigorous regulatory regime; a
comprehensive export control regime; and
active international cooperation. The
security regime covers physical protection,
material control and accounting, border
controls and radiological emergencies, he
said.
Pakistan is a major recipient of technical
cooperation from the IAEA, and is one of
35 members of the IAEA Board of
Governors, though it remains outside the
NPT.